As for Females, we still enjoy the treatment leftover from the nineteenth century belief Females should be protected. While the little boys are being beaten, we receive kind support. Since Females are not required to be strong, it is considered appropriate Females receive much kind, stabilizing mental/emotional/social support from parents and peers from an early age. We are given love, honor, respect simply for being Female. We are given much more protection from the more aggressive styles Males experience. This creates lower average stress along with much by comparison, mental/emotional/social knowledge and support, this is why Females mature faster than Males. This advantage carries on through adulthood.

This problem is not a racial problem but an international problem. The Male Crisis in every country due to the very same nineteenth century belief still at work in those countries. The reason this problem is affecting African American Males more so (Caucasian numbers for college hover around 62 to 38 percent in favor of Females) is that the lower the socioeconomic bracket and time of generations in such (that tends to not have as much information age skills) the more amplified those aggressions and neglects allowed upon Males. In addition as economic times deteriorate, the value of allowed aggressions is opened more so for Males while the valve of allowed aggressions remains in more of a protective hold. This is why the profound difference today in academic and also economic growth between Males and Females today.

So yes, in the information age, kind, good treatment creates the increased stability, lower average stress, and an organizational mind to learn, enjoy the learning process, and accumulate the necessary information age skills to compete in the information age. Too bad society has not learned this reasoning and so our brothers, fathers, and husbands are losing in a competition society has created with a much more difficult course to run.