Rarely discussed on the gender issue behind this

Paul Krugman does not a nice job laying out our educational shortcomings here. What he could have added is that women, for the most part, are on course. Men, by contrast, are dragging us down.

Krugman’s column:

 
——————————————————————————–

October 9, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
The Uneducated American
By PAUL KRUGMAN
If you had to explain America’s economic success with one word, that word would be “education.” In the 19th century, America led the way in universal basic education. Then, as other nations followed suit, the “high school revolution” of the early 20th century took us to a whole new level. And in the years after World War II, America established a commanding position in higher education.

But that was then. The rise of American education was, overwhelmingly, the rise of public education - and for the past 30 years our political scene has been dominated by the view that any and all government spending is a waste of taxpayer dollars. Education, as one of the largest components of public spending, has inevitably suffered.

Until now, the results of educational neglect have been gradual - a slow-motion erosion of America’s relative position. But things are about to get much worse, as the economic crisis - its effects exacerbated by the penny-wise, pound-foolish behavior that passes for “fiscal responsibility” in Washington - deals a severe blow to education across the board.

About that erosion: there has been a flurry of reporting recently about threats to the dominance of America’s elite universities. What hasn’t been reported to the same extent, at least as far as I’ve seen, is our relative decline in more mundane measures. America, which used to take the lead in educating its young, has been gradually falling behind other advanced countries.

Most people, I suspect, still have in their minds an image of America as the great land of college education, unique in the extent to which higher learning is offered to the population at large. That image used to correspond to reality. But these days young Americans are considerably less likely than young people in many other countries to graduate from college. In fact, we have a college graduation rate that’s slightly below the average across all advanced economies.

Even without the effects of the current crisis, there would be every reason to expect us to fall further in these rankings, if only because we make it so hard for those with limited financial means to stay in school. In America, with its weak social safety net and limited student aid, students are far more likely than their counterparts in, say, France to hold part-time jobs while still attending classes. Not surprisingly, given the financial pressures, young Americans are also less likely to stay in school and more likely to become full-time workers instead.

But the crisis has placed huge additional stress on our creaking educational system.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the United States economy lost 273,000 jobs last month. Of those lost jobs, 29,000 were in state and local education, bringing the total losses in that category over the past five months to 143,000. That may not sound like much, but education is one of those areas that should, and normally does, keep growing even during a recession. Markets may be troubled, but that’s no reason to stop teaching our children. Yet that’s exactly what we’re doing.

There’s no mystery about what’s going on: education is mainly the responsibility of state and local governments, which are in dire fiscal straits. Adequate federal aid could have made a big difference. But while some aid has been provided, it has made up only a fraction of the shortfall. In part, that’s because back in February centrist senators insisted on stripping much of that aid from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a k a the stimulus bill.

As a result, education is on the chopping block. And laid-off teachers are only part of the story. Even more important is the way that we’re shutting off opportunities.

For example, the Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported on the plight of California’s community college students. For generations, talented students from less affluent families have used those colleges as a stepping stone to the state’s public universities. But in the face of the state’s budget crisis those universities have been forced to slam the door on this year’s potential transfer students. One result, almost surely, will be lifetime damage to many students’ prospects - and a large, gratuitous waste of human potential.

So what should be done?

First of all, Congress needs to undo the sins of February, and approve another big round of aid to state governments. We don’t have to call it a stimulus, but it would be a very effective way to create or save thousands of jobs. And it would, at the same time, be an investment in our future.

Beyond that, we need to wake up and realize that one of the keys to our nation’s historic success is now a wasting asset. Education made America great; neglect of education can reverse the process.

 

Home
World U.S. N.Y. / Region Business Technology Science Health Sports Opinion Arts Style Travel Jobs Real Estate Automobiles Back to Top
Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company
Privacy Policy Terms of Service Search Corrections RSS First Look Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map

 

2 Responses to “Rarely discussed on the gender issue behind this”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    I don’t know whether I agree with Dr. Krugman or with you. The point of Dr. Krugman’s article seems to be, I think, that net societal education levels are going down relative to the rest of the world. We have seen for years the results of international tests where the United States is, to take a guess, say 25th out of 40 in Math, for instance. But people don’t seem to care. And I think a big part of why people don’t care is the perception that for the special areas where we must have people, that we still have plenty. For instance, the medical schools are filled to capacity. You still have, in many cases, hundreds of PhDs all applying for the few tenure track positions available. People think to themselves, do we need any more than the winners of those competitions? If not, what does it matter whether the U.S. is 15th or 25th? Whether U.S. women are on course in the sense that Dr. Krugman is talking about is a good question to which I don’t know the answer. If you look at the results of the international tests, but only take U.S. women, how much better do they do? Of course, since women are doing better in so many countries, it may not be reasonable to compare U.S. women to everyone in other countries. But then, if you compared U.S. women to just women in other countries, where would they rank? Would they be 20th compared to women in other countries instead of 25th? Would they be first? The same comparisons could be made with U.S. men, but there I agree with you. I assume U.S. men are doing miserably in international comparisons.

  2. Andrew Coulson _Cato_ Says:

    Krugman’s implication that U.S. education has been financially “neglected” is utterly wrong. A more reliable source on this subject is the on-line discussion forum of… the Daily Show: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/10/12/paul-krugman-vs-the-daily-show/

    And the mainstream media wonder why they are losing readers….

Leave a Reply