<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gender differences in high school graduation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/06/gender-differences-in-high-school-graduation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/06/gender-differences-in-high-school-graduation/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/06/gender-differences-in-high-school-graduation/#comment-12574</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyboysfail.com/?p=1165#comment-12574</guid>
		<description>By the way, Figure 5 is a direct contradiction of what the AAUW says.  Figure 5 shows that, nationally, white girls hold a 5% advantage in graduation rate over white boys.  The AAUW maintains there is no "boy crisis" because they say that, in the overall middle class, boys are doing as well as girls.  These numbers go against that, unless they want to parse it even further and say that you need to separate out poor whites from rich whites, etc.  Either way, you keep running into an emporer's new clothes situation.  The raw numbers, in terms of the female advantage in graduation rates and college attendance, are undeniable.  The "politics" for AAUW type groups then becomes how do you spin it so that these numbers don't interfere with their own goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Figure 5 is a direct contradiction of what the AAUW says.  Figure 5 shows that, nationally, white girls hold a 5% advantage in graduation rate over white boys.  The AAUW maintains there is no &#8220;boy crisis&#8221; because they say that, in the overall middle class, boys are doing as well as girls.  These numbers go against that, unless they want to parse it even further and say that you need to separate out poor whites from rich whites, etc.  Either way, you keep running into an emporer&#8217;s new clothes situation.  The raw numbers, in terms of the female advantage in graduation rates and college attendance, are undeniable.  The &#8220;politics&#8221; for AAUW type groups then becomes how do you spin it so that these numbers don&#8217;t interfere with their own goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/06/gender-differences-in-high-school-graduation/#comment-12567</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyboysfail.com/?p=1165#comment-12567</guid>
		<description>I am amazed that they even put those figures in the report.  Gender differences in graduation go along with more boys dropping out.  Many reports that are full of information about differences by race don't say a word about gender differences in graduation rates.  But there they are at a 5% to 10% level of more girls graduating than boys.  As Robert Dole once famously said, "Where's the outrage?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed that they even put those figures in the report.  Gender differences in graduation go along with more boys dropping out.  Many reports that are full of information about differences by race don&#8217;t say a word about gender differences in graduation rates.  But there they are at a 5% to 10% level of more girls graduating than boys.  As Robert Dole once famously said, &#8220;Where&#8217;s the outrage?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
