<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adolescent literacy bill merits watching&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/09/adolescent-literacy-bill-merits-watching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/09/adolescent-literacy-bill-merits-watching/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fail</title>
		<link>http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/09/adolescent-literacy-bill-merits-watching/#comment-12633</link>
		<dc:creator>fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyboysfail.com/?p=1172#comment-12633</guid>
		<description>i agree with poster above.  ridiculous..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with poster above.  ridiculous..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.whyboysfail.com/2009/11/09/adolescent-literacy-bill-merits-watching/#comment-12623</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whyboysfail.com/?p=1172#comment-12623</guid>
		<description>Senator Murray, according to the article, says that this funding will probably get rolled into the overall ESEA legislation.  This is probably unfortunate.  First, I think it could help to emphasize literacy problems if there was a separate bill for the funding.  And the other problem has to do with passage of the renewal of ESEA.  Last year they were having trouble coming up with a bill that a majority could go for.  If the bill stalls out again, then this literacy funding could get caught in the delay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Murray, according to the article, says that this funding will probably get rolled into the overall ESEA legislation.  This is probably unfortunate.  First, I think it could help to emphasize literacy problems if there was a separate bill for the funding.  And the other problem has to do with passage of the renewal of ESEA.  Last year they were having trouble coming up with a bill that a majority could go for.  If the bill stalls out again, then this literacy funding could get caught in the delay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
