But while expanding those elite charters, it’s also necessary to close the clunkers, as Andy Rotherham and I argue in US News:
By Andrew J. Rotherham, Richard Whitmire
Posted June 17, 2009
Andrew Rotherham is cofounder and publisher of Education Sector and blogs at Eduwonk.com. Richard Whitmire, immediate past president of the National Education Writers Association, blogs at whyboysfail.com.
Former basketball star and current Education Secretary Arne Duncan has a new move. Not only is he pressuring states to raise their caps on charter schools and figure out ways to expand high-performing charters, he also wants states to close lousy charter schools-a smart action to take considering this week’s study revealing the high number of mediocre charters out there.
As part of the requirements accompanying the economic stimulus money for states, Duncan is ordering states to report not just how many charters-independent public schools-they allow to operate but also how many they have closed for low performance. The focus on quality signals a major change in the federal government’s posture toward state charter school laws.
Outstanding charter schools, often dubbed “no excuses” charters, have become the miracle workers of urban education. High-performing charter school networks around the country and outstanding charter schools like Roxbury Prep and MATCH in Boston or the Achievement First schools in Connecticut are debunking the notion that urban kids can’t be educated well absent an unprecedented social transformation of their communities.
But here’s the catch. All the schools in the elite charter school networks number only about 300 and there are 4,600 charters operating in the United States. What about the rest?
(more…)