Good story on Pa. gender gap (with two suggested clarifications from your blogger)
Monday, January 26th, 2009
Interesting story from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review on the college gender gaps in that state. (Photo, courtesy of the newspaper, of students at a community college that’s 63% female.) I’ll paste in the entire story below, but first offer these two observations:
1. Local educators offer the “girls are more mature than boys” explanation for why so many more girls than boys head off to college. And yet, as the story points out, these gender imbalances are relatively recent in Pa. Did boys suddenly become less mature, or girls suddenly more mature?
2. Pa. labor officials serve up the women-get-more-benefits-from-college theory for the college imbalances, which is conventional wisdom. Guys can earn $60,000 a year as bulldozer operators without going to college, whereas women need a degree for the professions they prefer. Problem is, this is a case where conventional wisdom works only on the anecdotal level.
The official data referees on this question are found at the U.S. Department of Education and College Board. Both scrutinize every piece of data about the impact of earning a degree and both agree: Men and women get exactly the same benefit from a degree. At one time that wasn’t the case; women truly did get a bigger boost, but changes in the economy disfavoring traditional male jobs altered that formula. Equally interesting: the current recession appears to be accelerating that trend, with more male than female jobs lost.
Enough editorializing. The story:



